New York Times Magazine has a great article on the intelligence community and the need to introduce more open technology–things like wikis and blogs, things that millions of people use every day for more mundane pursuits. Chris Anderson offers some commentary, awesome links, and takes it a step further: “What if, rather than just starting blogs and wikis behind military firewalls where the rules are most strict, the intelligence agencies encouraged them out in the open, catalyzing conversations between people who aren’t constrained by the same laws?”

The Perfect Thing: How the iPod Shuffles Commerce, Culture, and Coolness (review: 3.5/5)

Stephen Levy’s very readable story of the obscenely popular iPod came just after I bought my new computer, and served a welcome distraction as I imported all my music. As an interesting publishing twist on the ‘shuffle’ idea, various editions of this book have the self-contained chapters (with titles like “Cool” and “Apple” and “Personal”) re-arranged in different orders, sandwiched between the intro and the coda. Kind of cool.
Luckily, this book is more biography than love letter. There’s a lot of industry history, delving into early portable music hits like Sony’s Walkman, a bit of the sordid history of the music publishing industry in the midst of the mp3 revolution, insider perspectives on Apple’s development process, whether or not shuffle mode is really random, and so on.

And of course, there’s a lot about infatuation with the iPod itself. Levy cites Virginia Postrel’s book on industrial design:

Having spent a century or more focused primarily on other goals–solving manufacturing problems, lowering costs, making goods and services widely available, saving energy–we are increasingly engaged in making our world special. More people in more aspects of life are drawing pleasure and meaning from he way their persons, places, and things look and feel.

Thank you, Capitalism. Of course, recognizing that progress is one of the reasons the iPod is so successful amid products with better specs. “More” isn’t always more. It’s just a beautifully designed object that’s a joy to use, in the way we choose. As Levy says:

shuffle turns out to be the techna franca of the digital era–not just a feature on a gadget but an entire way of viewing the world, representing the power that comes from aggregating content from a variety of sources and playing it back in an order that render irrelevant the intended ordering by those who produced or first distributed the content.

Yes, we like control. More, please.

Anyone else getting a lot of Italian spam lately? Maybe I just have that qualcosa speciale. But still I offer my thanks to Akismet for making this rather painless.

I spent the morning listening to all the Productive Talks podcasts at 43 Folders, a series of dialogues between productivity gurus Merlin Mann and David Allen. They are excellent conversations on GTD philosophy and action, without much packaging fluff.
David has some hilarious ranting in the fifth episode about e-mail. Really, why are we still whining about e-mail? Another good moment came in a brief detour about kids being raised in a GTD household: “That’s great, Grandma, but what’s the next action here?” I love it. And then there’s this important philosophical bit to keep in mind: “Quite frankly, you shouldn’t be thinking about GTD.”

I’ve taken first steps to collect and process, and I can see how easy it is to get distracted by “perfecting your system,” when really it’s just another project to be evaluated and processed. Lastly, I love how fast they talk. It’s such a nice change from some other o-ver a-nun-ci-at-ed podcasts I’ve heard. Go listen, but you might want to read the book first.

ReputationDefender is a service “created to defend your and your family’s good name on the Internet.” The two-part goal is “to SEARCH out all information about you and/or your child on the Internet” and “to DESTROY, at your command, all inaccurate, inappropriate, hurtful, and slanderous information about you and/or your child using our proprietary in-house methodology.”
I’m just dying to know what the “proprietary in-house methodology” is. Looks like they have a few attorneys on staff… [via library stuff]