David von Drehle writes that our obsession with physical appearance may not be so shallow. It’s a nice essay on the (eternal) issues of society, beauty, and self-image:

Critics sometimes refer longingly to earlier times, when Rubensesque nudes and Marilyn Monroe bombshells rang the beauty bell without starving themselves. When I really studied those earlier pictures, though, it struck me that the issue isn’t really weight, but maturity. Something similar appears in the Greek and Roman marbles. Older gods remained fit and powerful, but their bodies were broader and fleshier; Zeus wasn’t trying to fit into the same jeans he wore when he was Mercury’s age.

“A future society will very likely have the technological ability and the motivation to create large numbers of completely realistic historical simulations and be able to overcome any ethical and legal obstacles to doing so. It is thus highly probable that we are a form of artificial intelligence inhabiting one of these simulations. To avoid stacking (i.e. simulations within simulations), the termination of these simulations is likely to be the point in history when the technology to create them first became widely available, (estimated to be 2050). Long range planning beyond this date would therefore be futile.” [via mises]

Today is my birthday

Wikipedia reveals other reasons to celebrate (and/or mourn) November 5.
Today is Guy Fawkes Day. This is the 401st anniversary of Fawkes‘ involvement in the Gunpowder Plot to assassinate King James I. A couple generations later, this date also marked the beginning of the Glorious Revolution that eventually toppled James II. Another little bit of rebellion came in 1872, when Susan B. Anthony did a little bit of civil disobedience by daring to cast a vote. (A woman! Gasp!)

Monopoly first hit the shelves during the heart of the Depression, and I Love Lucy debuted on November 5, 1951. In 1979, the United States was declared to be the Great Satan. And Saddam Hussein was just sentenced to death.

The New York Times and the BBC both have “On This Day” features.

Thinking out loud on outside.in

Steven Johnson announces the birth of outside.in, “an attempt to collectively build the geographic Web, neighborhood by neighborhood.” It’s in the early stages (may I please have a link to “home”?), but I’m thinking it could be very cool.
Once you spend a decent amount of time online, especially if you’re a blog reader, you realize that there is so much content out there. The shameful thing is that so much of it is just sort of floating in the either. The potential is there for a service like outside.in to add some tethers or anchors to all this information, aggregating all the events, stories, and conversations happening in a community. It’s RSS for where you live.

While the description has something of a present-tense bias, there is the potential for rich juxtaposition of old and new by integrating something like geo-tagged Wikipedia entries. Maybe if you hear a little buzz about the Atlanta Beltline project, you could hop over and learn about it one of the neighborhoods it will cross, like Cabbagetown. What you end up with is a conversation that is not only (gleefully) tied to a physical location, but there is also the history running parallel (or is that perpendicular?).

I wonder if there are any plans for mobile-friendly access? Seems like a cool way for travelers to get acquainted as well. The obvious challenge is getting enough caring people and relevant data in there. I like it, let’s see where it goes.

Ordinary People (review: 4.5/5)

“The problem of connecting is partly that of fitting mood with opportunity.” Judith Guest‘s book was such a pleasant surprise. In a nutshell, it’s about a family dealing with tragedy, focusing on that odd relationship of individual and family. Nothing new there, but the writing is so tight and so focused. What I really like is that Guest can slide so smoothly from narration to thought to dialogue and every which other way. The writing as much as the style makes it a compulsive page-turner. Add in some great male characters whose internal world feels really genuine, and some genuinely laugh-out-loud moments balance the more patient, reflective meditation on family. This bit was perfect:

He would do it, too, if it were not for a frenetic-butterfly manner that she radiates. It grates on his nerves. She has an endless supply of nervous energy. Tiny women are often like this, he thinks. They never run down. They overwhelm him, make him feel lumpish and stupid. Too large.

Another priceless bit of craft was husband and wife driving out to a dinner party. Within their routine dialogue, Guest makes the next scene transfer so seamlessly…

“We’ll go in the spring,” he says. “I promise.”
She doesn’t answer.
“Who’s going to be there tonight?” Testing. Her tone when she answers will tell him if she is angry.
“Well, the Murrays. It’s their house.” She slides over next to him. Happily grateful, he squeezes her hand. Wonderful, unpredictable girl. “And Mac and Ann Kline, Ed and Marty Genthe. And us.”
“Why us? We hardly know the Murrays.”
“That’s why. That’s why you have people over, darling. To get to know them better.”

(thanks for the recommendation, Kelli)